Cases 1 - 10 of 3,504
Gormley v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1270
Petitioner:
KATHLEEN GORMLEY
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL and PHIL WEISER, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Adebonojo v. Williams, et al
as 24-1269
Petitioner:
DAVID ADEBONOJO
Respondent:
DEAN WILLIAMS and PHIL WEISER, Attorney General, State of Colorado
Kelly v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 1:2024cv00642
Petitioner:
Jonathan Kelly
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hackborn v. Parsons, et al
as 24-1264
Petitioner:
DEAN D. HACKBORN
Respondent:
WARDEN PARSONS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Sears v. Long, et al
as 24-1256
Petitioner:
CRISTINA W. SEARS
Respondent:
RYAN LONG, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Morris v. Wyoming Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Terrill Kim Morris
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General and State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres
as 1:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Florres, Jaquez and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Attorney General State of New Mexico
as 1:2024cv00347
Petitioner:
Carlos Torres
Respondent:
Attorney General State of New Mexico and R Otero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cordova (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01590
Petitioner:
Louis M. Cordova
Respondent:
Diggins and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simkins v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. SIMKINS
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
