Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Chappell v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1100
Petitioner:
ARTHUR JAMES CHAPPELL
Respondent:
STATE OF COLORADO and ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Chappell v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1033
Petitioner:
ARTHUR JAMES CHAPPELL
Respondent:
STATE OF COLORADO and ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Chappell (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv02341
Petitioner:
Arthur James Chappell
Respondent:
State of Colorado Adams County, Adams County Sherriff's Office, Michael Carbajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chappell v. Monday
as 13-6178
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. CHAPPELL
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM MONDAY, Warden
Chappell v. Monday et al
as 5:2013cv00231
Petitioner:
Michael D Chappell
Respondent:
William Monday and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Chappell, et al
as 10-1176
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. MASKE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY CHAPPELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Maske v. Chappell et al
as 1:2010cv00834
Petitioner:
Jerry Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maske, vs. Chappell, et al
as 1:2010cv00618
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Chappell et al
as 1:2010cv00473
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske v. Chappell et al
as 1:2010cv00068
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
