Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Chestine (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv02215
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Chestine, Jr.
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollingsworth v. Smith
as 5:2023cv03163
Petitioner:
Lucas Eugene Blaine Hollingsworth
Respondent:
Laura Kelly and Danny Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sitsler v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Danny Joe Sitsler
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tallie v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv03284
Petitioner:
Joseph N. Tallie
Respondent:
Danny Smith, Kansas, State of, Richard Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Logue v. State of Utah
as 2:2021cv00533
Petitioner:
Danny Logue and Daniel Leroy Sturgis
Defendant:
State of Utah
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Bear et al
as 5:2020cv00016
Petitioner:
Danny R Campbell
Respondent:
Scott Dennis and Carl Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan et al v. United States The
as 5:2019cv00171
Respondent:
United States The
Petitioner:
Kenneth Johnson, David Brian Morgan, Danny Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bender et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv00458
Petitioner:
Danny Bender and Pamela Bender
Respondent:
Donald Trump, Director of the Bureau of Prisons and Warden of FCI Englewood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reisman v. Allbaugh
as 6:2018cv00034
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Reisman
Respondent:
Joe M. Allbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cook v. Dauffenbach et al
as 1:2017cv01896
Petitioner:
Danny Russell Cook
Respondent:
Scott Dauffenbach and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
