Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Demos v. Washington Territory et al
as 1:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
Washington Territory, State of Washington, The London Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Demos v. Washington Territory
as 2:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Washington Territory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. United States Sec'y of Defense, et al
as 13-8035
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF STATE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Demos v. United State
as 12-8059
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00115
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demos v. Glebe
as 10-8025
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICK GLEBE, Washington Attorney General
Demos v. Glebe
as 10-5046
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICK GLEBE
Demos v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2010cv00241
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Utah, State of Washington, President of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Washington Attorney General
as 2:2010cv00038
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Washington Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos, Jr. v. State of Washington, et al
as 10-3055
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
