Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Crump v. Federal Bureau of Prisons ADMAX Superintendent Cus
as 23-1300
Petitioner / Appellant:
NORVELL CRUMP
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ADMAX SUPERINTENDENT CUSTODIAN, Weise/Robinson
Crump v. Robinson
as 1:2023cv01433
Petitioner:
Norvell Crump
Respondent:
Weise Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Harvanek
as 23-5036
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH EARL ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
KAMERON HARVANEK
Robinson v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00123
Petitioner:
Byron Robinson
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Payne
as 5:2023cv03038
Petitioner:
Michael A. Robinson
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pyles, et al v. United States District Court, District of Kansas, et al
as 22-3158
Petitioner / Appellant:
DYLAN PYLES, next friend of, AKA Jason Alan Justice, SANDY GLEE JUSTICE, next friend of, AKA Jason Alan Justice and TERRY JUSTICE, next friend of, AKA Jason Alan Justice
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS, SAM A. CROW, JULIE A. ROBINSON and others
Robinson v. Fairbairn
as 1:2022cv01524
Petitioner:
David Wayne Robinson
Respondent:
Fairbairn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Petersen
as 22-3087
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARVELLE LAMONT ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAZEL PETERSEN
Robinson (ID 85853) v. Petersen
as 5:2022cv03031
Petitioner:
Charvelle Lamont Robinson
Respondent:
Hazel Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Crow
as 4:2021cv00327
Petitioner:
Damion M. Robinson and Damion M Robinson
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
