General Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 639
Owen v. Powell
as 24-4065
Petitioner: SEAN C. OWEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF UTAH and ROBERT POWELL, Warden
Thompson v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00557
Petitioner: Dewayne Antwon Thompson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sebastian III, George v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00527
Petitioner: George J. Sebastian III
Respondent: United States of America, Merrick B Garland and Markenzy Lapointe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Spalding v. United States
as 24-6091
Petitioner: DAVID L. SPALDING
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Wilson v. Payne
as 24-3064
Petitioner: AARON W. WILSON
Respondent: KEVIN PAYNE, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks
Dillon v. Payne
as 24-3065
Petitioner: SEAN J. DILLON
Respondent: KEVIN PAYNE, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks
Arraz-Saenz (PS) v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Petitioner: Horacio Arraz-Saenz
Respondent: United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Services and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner: Jonathan Graham
Respondent: Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Spalding v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, et al
as 24-6081
Petitioner: DAVID L. SPALDING
Respondent: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS, WARDEN GOLDEY, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Spalding v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00337
Petitioner: David L Spalding
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?