Cases 11 - 20 of 134
Noe v. United States Government, et al
as 23-1025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GEORGE NOE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, BERKLEY, Dr., H. SCHOUWEILER and others
Snedeker v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Bradford Wayne Snedeker, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Anjali Nandi, Denise Mertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colley v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv02889
Plaintiff:
Terry Jerome Colley
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Collette S. Peters, C. Lepe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Garcia v. Polis et al
as 1:2022cv02151
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Beth Gibson, Conor Flanigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellant:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
MARK FRENCH, BRIAN JOHNSON, ROBERT W. DIERKS and others
Hunnicutt v. Peters, et al
as 22-2053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARNELL HUNNICUTT, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL PETERS, Warden, WILLIAM EDGMAN, Deputy Warden, ESTEVAN FLORES and others
Garcia v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, Clark Smith, Spencer Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lin v. Villagomez et al
as 1:2021cv00026
Plaintiff:
Zhou You Lin
Defendant:
Wally Villagomez, Peter Lieto and Georgia Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. Spain et al
as 1:2021cv02099
Plaintiff:
Peter M. Adams
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Larry Spain, Steve Bade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
