Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Sharp v. General Services Department of New Mexico et al
as 1:2021cv00829
Plaintiff:
Donald Sharp and Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
General Services Department of New Mexico and Clinton Nicly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Lawson et al
as 5:2021cv03132
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Hammans et al
as 5:2020cv00595
Plaintiff:
Damon Neal Dunbar, Jr
Defendant:
Staci Hunter, Elaina Flores, Ricky McPhearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wind v. United States Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Kate Knowles, Matthew Newcomer, James McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carl Wind, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glivar v. Victory Outreach et al
as 1:2019cv00836
Defendant:
Victory Outreach, Google, Marisol Larez and others
Plaintiff:
Meigra Marie Glivar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eldridge v. Matevansian et al
as 1:2018cv01786
Defendant:
Matevansian and Smilage
Plaintiff:
Clinton T. Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hayner v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2018cv00750
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hayner
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, State of Colorado, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2018cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Barnes , David A. Banks , Demetrius K. Harper and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, C.R. Goetz, C.R. (I) Goetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eldridge v. Osagie, et al
as 17-1089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE
Defendant - Appellee:
A. OSAGIE, P.A., G. SANTINI, M.D. and P. LAIRD, R.D.
Randle v. Leaks et al
as 2:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Clinton Randle
Defendant:
FNU Leaks and UHP Federal Evidence Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
