Cases 31 - 40 of 247
Clark (PS) v. Lanory et al
as 1:2023cv02060
Plaintiff:
Chad Clark
Defendant:
Lanory, Trisa Keyser and Haenlein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark (PS) v. Kartchner et al.
as 1:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Chad Clark
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Jacob Kartchner, Wiard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Anderson et al
as 1:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, Clark Smith, Beth Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintana v. Wirthlin, et al
as 23-4083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY WIRTHLIN, RAYMOND S. SHUEY, DOMAIN SUMMARY and others
Quintana v. Clark, et al
as 23-4084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
LOGAN CLARK, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, TODD GAY, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison and others
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Schendorf v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
Lance P. Schendorf
Defendant:
Daniel Gomez, Tom Thwaits, JP Matzke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintana v. Wirthlin, et al
as 23-4062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY WIRTHLIN, RAYMOND S. SHUEY, DOMAIN SUMMARY and others
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Fawley v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W Fawley
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, John Doe, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
