Cases 31 - 40 of 139
Lobato v. San Juan County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv01041
Petitioner:
Marcellus Lobato
Respondent:
USA
Defendant:
San Juan County Detention Center, FNU Smart and FNU Reuchount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. US of A Federal Government et al
as 1:2021cv02927
Plaintiff:
Zachariah C. Diamond
Defendant:
USA, Medical and Recreational Marijuana States and Lottery States of USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohamed v. Sanistevens et al
as 1:2021cv02676
Plaintiff:
Khalfan Khamis Mohamed
Defendant:
Sanistevens, (I) Sanistevens, Medrano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. USA
as 1:2021cv02107
Plaintiff:
David J. Martin
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Eberhart et al
as 1:2021cv01521
Defendant:
Banuelos, USA, Lindgren and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vreeland v. People's Republic of China, The et al
as 1:2021cv01178
Defendant:
Wuhan Institute of Virology, The, William Little, Philip A. Brimmer and others
Plaintiff:
Delmart E.J.M. Vreeland, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowalczyk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator of Florence FCC/USP, Health Services Dept. of BOP, US Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01169
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Dept. of Justice and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Socolov v. USA et al
as 4:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
Oleg Socolov
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Defendant:
William LNU and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv00563
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Dept. of Justice and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
