Civil Rights Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 339
Jones (PS) v. Deines et al
as 1:2024cv01429
Plaintiff: Adam Jones
Defendant: Curtis Deines, April Ogley, Robert Dick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson (PS) v. Hart et al
as 1:2024cv01342
Plaintiff: Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant: William Hart, Midge Barton and Adam Murdie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff: DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant: CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Nelson (PS) v. Murdie et al
as 1:2024cv01177
Plaintiff: Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant: Adam Murdie, Midge Barton, Aaron Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson (PS) v. Murdie et al
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff: Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant: Adam Murdie, Josh Ash, Midge Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saavedra et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: Adam Saavedra, Quirino Villanueva, Chauncey Johnson and others
Defendant: FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isbill v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6064
Plaintiff: GEORGE WILLIAM ISBILL
Defendant: KEVIN STITT, Governor, LARRY MORRIS, Pardon & parole Board member, ADAM LUCK, Pardon & parole Board member and others
Teague (PS) v. Kurtenbach et al
as 1:2024cv00754
Plaintiff: David Adam Teague
Defendant: Angela Kurtenbach, Stephen Giles and Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowland v. Adams, et al
as 24-4008
Plaintiff: DWAYNE TAYLOR ROWLAND, JR.
Defendant: R. ADAMS, Officer, FNU WEBB, Officer, B. EGBERT, Correctional Officer and others
Adams v. Martinez
as 24-1026
Plaintiff: ERIC ADAMS
Defendant: OFFICER MARTINEZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?