Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Scott v. Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Shyesha Scott
Defendant:
Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority, Daylen Rivers and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Ouachita River Correctional Unit
as 5:2024cv03003
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dewayne Moore
Defendant:
Ouachita River Correctional Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Garfield County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2021cv00528
Defendant:
John Burton, Daylon Rivers, Ben Crooks and others
Plaintiff:
William Christopher Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merworth v. Garfield County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2021cv00472
Defendant:
Mya Burkes, Garfield County Detention Facility, Daylon Rivers and others
Plaintiff:
Jason H Merworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Wilkins et al
as 4:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
Charles K Johnston, Jr
Defendant:
Lisa M Wilkins, Mark Bernthal, Vic Regalado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Samuels et al
as 1:2012cv02501
Plaintiff:
Imam-Muhammad Mustafa Abdullah
Defendant:
Samuels, Williams, Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Blackman v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv02750
Plaintiff:
Robert Blackman
Defendant:
Blake R. Davis, Russell Krist, Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdullah v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv01167
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Mustafa Abdullah
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Davis, Chris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anonymous Human Rights Activist v. Rangel et al
as 1:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
Anonymous Human Rights Activist
Defendant:
P. Rangel, Szemborki, Debra Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Vigil et al
as 1:2011cv00494
Plaintiff:
Lamont L. Warren
Defendant:
Victoria Vigil, Lyde, Vigil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
