Cases 11 - 20 of 25
HP Distribution, LLC et al v. United States of America
as 2:2014mc00237
Petitioner:
HP Distribution, LLC and Tanner Cunningham
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
HP Distribution, LLC et al v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv02549
Petitioner:
HP Distribution, LLC and Tanner C Cunningham
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Jewell v. United State
as 13-7038
Petitioner - Appellee:
SAM T. JEWELL
Respondent - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jewell v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv00424
Plaintiff:
Sam T. Jewell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Villarreal v. United State
as 12-1131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALOMON JUAN MARCOS VILLARREAL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Manke et al v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv01086
Movant:
Dwayne Manke and Norma Manke
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Erwin v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv00572
Plaintiff:
Ricky A Erwin
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Jonathan B N Albarran and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Eldridge v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv00258
Petitioner:
Joseph Eldridge
Respondent:
United States of America, Commissioner of Internal Revenue and Yvonne Poulsen
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Lazo et al v. Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00662
Petitioner:
Guillermo Lazo and Judy Lazo
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America, Lynn Rozenski and James Dwyer
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Day et al v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv01950
Petitioner:
Frank B. Day and FBD Management, Inc.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
