Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Grate v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02171
Plaintiff:
Austin Grate
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Iron Bar Holdings LLC v. Cape et al
as 2:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Iron Bar Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Bradley H Cape, Zachary M Smith, Phillip G Yeomans and others
Petitioner:
Backcountry Hunters & Anglers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Owen et al v. Brown et al
as 5:2021cv00481
Plaintiff:
Hunter Owen, SXS USA LLC and Laser Wolf FX Inc
Defendant:
Nick Brown and DroneBois LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Coody v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02510
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Britney Coody
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hofschneider et al v. Torres et al
as 1:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Attorney General Edward E. Manibusan, Governor Ralph DLG Torres, Ph.D. Michael F. Dega and others
Plaintiff:
Richard U. Hofschneider and Liana S. Hofschneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunter v. GC Services, LP
as 1:2020cv00701
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hunter
Defendant:
GC Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coleman et al v. Statewide Collections Inc et al
as 5:2017cv01191
Plaintiff:
Albert A Coleman , Allen Henderson , Breauna Lee Roberson and others
Defendant:
Statewide Collections Inc , Quick Loans Inc , Breit Company The and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hoopes v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hoopes
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hunter v. Collection Technology, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00774
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hunter
Defendant:
Collection Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Remo Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01425
Plaintiff:
Trenton H. Parker
Defendant:
Remo Enterprises, LLC, SBB Lending, LLC, 123 Main, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
