Environmental Matters Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
In Re: Gold King Mine Release in San Juan County, Colorado, on August 5, 2015
as 1:2018md02824
Defendant: Gold King Mine Release in San Juan County, Colorado, on August 5, 2015, Gold King Mines Corporation, John Does and others
Plaintiff: Navajo Nation, State of New Mexico, Fannie Marie Jim and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Environmental Restoration, LLC
Special Master: Alan C. Torgerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Aikwig et al v. Michelin North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00326
Plaintiff: Amber Aikwig , Mary Ball , William Baron and others
Defendant: Michelin North America, Inc. and B.F. Goodrich Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE et al v. JEWELL et al
as 2:2016cv00307
Plaintiff: Defenders of Wildlife and WYOMING WILDLIFE ADVOCATES
Defendant: S. M. R. JEWELL , Jonathan B Jarvis and SUE MASICA
Intervenor_defendant: State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Donelson, et al v. United States, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5174
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARTHA DONELSON, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all similarly situated persons and JOHN FRIEND
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Through the Department of the Interior and its agency, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P., CHAPARRAL ENERGY, LLC and others
Hayes v. DOI, et al
as 16-5072
Plaintiff - Appellee: DAVID P. HAYES, Trustee for the Paul B Hayes Family Trust, Dated April 30, 2010
Defendant - Appellant: DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Defendant: CHAPARRAL ENERGY, L.L.C.
Defendant Intervenor: OSAGE MINERALS COUNCIL
Hayes v. Osage Minerals, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5060
Plaintiff - Appellee: DAVID P. HAYES, Trustee for the Paul B Hayes Family Trust, Dated April 30, 2010
Defendant: CHAPARRAL ENERGY, L.L.C., DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant Intervenor - Appellant: OSAGE MINERALS COUNCIL
Western Watersheds Project et al v. Pool et al
as 2:2013cv00340
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project , John G. Carter and Jonathan B. Ratner
Defendant: Mike Pool, Jonathan B. Jarvis and Kenneth Lee Salazar
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Stratford Holding LLC v. Foot Locker Retail Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00772
Plaintiff: Stratford Holding LLC
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail Inc , Fog Cap Retail Investors LLC , Kyser Koncepts Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AJB Properties, LTD. v. Zarda Bar-B-Q of Lenexa, LLC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02021
Plaintiff: AJB Properties, LTD.
Defendant: Zarda Bar-B-Q of Lenexa, LLC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Attorney General for Oklahoma, et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. W.A. Drew Edmondson, in his capacity as Attorney General, FDBA W.A. Drew Edmondson and OFFICE OF THE OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. C. Miles Tolbert in his capacity as the Trustee for Natural Resources for the State of Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellee: CARGILL TURKEY PRODUCTION, LLC, CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., CARGILL, INC. and others
Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant: TAHLEQUAH LIVESTOCK AUCTION, INC.
Defendant: RANDY ALLEN, BIG JOHN'S, CHICKEN CREEK VILLAGE STORE and others
Third-Party-Defendant: JOHN E. ADAIR, JOHN W. ADAIR, VIRGINIA W. ADAIR and others
Third Party Defendant, Counter Claimant: CITY OF WATTS
Intervenor: ARKANSAS NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION and STATE OF ARKANSAS
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ARKANSAS
Movant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF DAIRYMEN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?