Cases 121 - 130 of 289
Beagles v. Watkins et al
as 2:2016cv00506
Plaintiff:
Eddie Beagles
Defendant:
George Watkins, State of New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions , Joel Saavedra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosiere v. USA
as 1:2016cv01251
Petitioner:
Shaun Rosiere
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Diagnostic Imaging Group et al v. Health and Human Services Department of
as 5:2016cv00511
Plaintiff:
Diagnostic Imaging Group and John Hamlin
Defendant:
Health and Human Services Department of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Whitson v. United States Forest Service
as 1:2016cv01090
Plaintiff:
Kathy Whitson
Defendant:
United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Davis v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2016cv00701
Plaintiff:
Gilbert D. Davis
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Robert (I) A. Mc Donald, Robert A. Mc Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Panhandle Citizens for Truth in Gaming Inc v. Department of the Interior et al
as 5:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Citizens for Truth in Gaming Inc
Defendant:
Department of the Interior and Indian Affairs Bureau of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Friends of Animals v. Bureau of Indian Affairs
as 1:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Friends of Animals v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
as 1:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Friends of Animals v. United States Forest Service
as 1:2016cv00196
Plaintiff:
Friends of Animals
Defendant:
United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Cheavens v. National Forest Service
as 1:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Cheavens
Defendant:
National Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
