Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Marker v. New Mexico House of Representatives et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Larry Marker
Respondent:
New Mexico House of Representatives, Eliseo Alcon, Anthony Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Seay et al v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry et al
as 5:2020cv00915
Defendant:
Michael Howl, Bobby Carmen, James Gore and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph P Seay and Lois Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. Jones
as 5:2017cv00717
Plaintiff:
Kim Patricia Bowers
Defendant:
Alberta Rose Josephine Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cox v. Utah Division of Water Rights et al
as 1:2010cv00194
Plaintiff:
Duane Morley Cox
Defendant:
Utah Division of Water Rights and Kent Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kansas Judicial Watch, et al v. Mike Stout, et al
as 09-3356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KANSAS JUDICIAL WATCH, CHARLES M. HART and ROBB RUMSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE L. STOUT, in his official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications, JENNIFER L. JONES, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications, NANCY ANSTAETT, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications and others
Kansas Judicial, et al v. Stout, et al
as 06-3290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KANSAS JUDICIAL WATCH, CHARLES M. HART and ROBB RUMSEY
Defendant - Appellant:
MIKEL L. STOUT, in his official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications, JENNIFER L. JONES, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications, NANCY ANSTAETT, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, NATIONAL AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CAMPAIGN CONDUCT, COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
