Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DAC Investment Management (China) Ltd. v. Imperial Pacific International (CNMI) LLC
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
DAC Investment Management (China) Ltd.
Defendant:
Imperial Pacific International (CNMI) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Komar Distribution Services v. China United Lines Co. Ltd.
as 6:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Komar Distribution Services
Defendant:
China United Lines Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Simpson et al v. P. F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02519
Defendant:
Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., P. F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc. and Safety National Casualty Corporation
Plaintiff:
Chris Simpson and Sherri Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Insured Aircraft Title Service LLC v. Feihang Yuachuang Investments Limited et al
as 5:2019cv00390
Defendant:
HNA Holding International Group Co LTD, Feihang Yuachuang Investments Limited, China Business Aviation Group Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Insured Aircraft Title Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Sho Services, LLC v. China Film Group Corporation
as 1:2017cv01200
Plaintiff:
Sho Services, LLC
Defendant:
China Film Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDeal Investments, LLLP v. China Motor Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02117
Plaintiff:
McDeal Investments, LLLP
Defendant:
China Motor Corporation, David Shelburg, Sr., Western Distributors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Big Sky Network Canada, LTD v. Sichuan Provincial Government, et al
as 07-4014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BIG SKY NETWORK CANADA, LTD., a British Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
SICHUAN PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT, a subdivision of the People's Republic of China and QUIGYANG DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, a subdivision of the People's Republic of China
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
