Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Flyability Inc.
as 1:2022cv02881
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Flyability Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Sigma Defense Systems LLC
as 1:2022cv02884
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Sigma Defense Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Vicon Industries Inc.
as 1:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Vicon Industries Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Phase One A/S
as 1:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Phase One A/S
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Rachio, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03300
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Rachio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. WideOpenWest, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03154
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
WideOpenWest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Deezer Inc
as 1:2020cv03037
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Deezer Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03340
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Starz Entertainment, LLC
as 1:2019cv03189
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Starz Entertainment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lone Star Promotions et al v. Abbey Lane Quilts LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Abbey Lane Quilts LLC, Janice Liljenquist and Abbey Lane Quilts
Plaintiff:
Marcea Owen and Lone Star Promotions
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
