Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Choctaw Nation, et al v. HUD, et al
as 14-1338
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA and HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, DEBORAH A. HERNANDEZ, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing and others
Choctaw Nation, et al v. HUD, et al
as 14-1340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA and HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, DEBORAH A. HERNANDEZ, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing and others
Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing v. HUD, et al
as 14-1331
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TLINGIT-HAIDA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary of Housing and Urban Developement, DEBORAH A. HERNANDEZ, General Deputy Assistant Secretary fpr Public and Indian Housing and others
Conrads v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2014mc00195
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Petitioner:
Lawrence Conrads and Deborah Conrads
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Modoc Lassen Indian Housing v. DOHUD, et al
as 14-1313
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MODOC LASSEN INDIAN HOUSING AUTHORITY, the tribally designated housing entity for other Grindstone Indian Rancheria of Wintun-Wailaki Indians of California
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SHAUN DONOVAN, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, DEBORAH A. HERNANDEZ, General Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Management Solutions et al
as 2:2011cv01165
Intervenor Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association-Reserve at Abbie Lakes, U.S. Bank National Association-CW Capital Asset Mangement & Apartments at Lakesridge, U.S. Bank National Association-2011-K704 and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Gil A. Miller
Defendant:
Management Solutions, Wendell A. Jacobson and Allen R. Jacobson
Consolidated Defendant:
Progressive Services
Intervenor Defendant:
CRVII Escena Lend, LLC, Bank Midwest N.A., Fannie Mae and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Hally Jacobson, Sage Canyon Cabin, Sage Canyon Creek and others
Claimant:
Den Glen, Lake Charlestonian, Carmen Lenhof Israelsen, LLP and others
Amicus Curiae:
MSI Investor Group
Intervenor:
Greg B. Bailey
Interested Party:
Mutual of Omaha LoanPro, Lanny Waite, Maxine Waite and others
Petitioner:
Platinum Protection LLC, Americanwest Bank, Virginia Padilla and others
Not Yet Classified:
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Nambe Pueblo Housing Entity v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) et al
as 1:2011cv01516
Plaintiff:
Nambe Pueblo Housing Entity
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) , Shaun Donovan , Sandra Henriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 4101
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. HUD, et al
as 11-7040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION DIVISION OF HOUSING
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity, SANDRA HENRIQUEZ, in her official capacity and others
Marshall v. HUD, et al
as 10-9571
Petitioner:
PAUL WAYNE MARSHALL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MERCEDES MARQUEZ, MARK JOHNSTON, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Community Planning and Development (CPD) and others
Lamar Lynch v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 2:2009mc00229
Movant:
Lamar Lynch
Respondent:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
