Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-9552
Petitioner:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, STATE CHAMBER OF OKLAHOMA, TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
State of Oklahoma, ex rel., et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-9551
Petitioner:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. and E. SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GINA MCCARTHY, official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 4:2015cv00386
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America , National Federation of Independent Business , State Chamber of Oklahoma and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , Gina McCarthy , United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Oklahoma v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 4:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , United States Army Corps of Engineers , Gina McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Audubon Society of Greater Denver v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 1:2014cv02749
Petitioner:
Audubon Society of Greater Denver
Respondent:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
WildEarth Guardians v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00666
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Reclamation and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Miscellaneou:
Civil Process Clerk and Eric H. Holder
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Sierra Club, et al v. Bostick, et al
as 14-6099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, INC., CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE OKLAHOMA and EAST TEXAS SUB REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, MICHAEL TEAGUE, in his official capacity as Tulsa District Commander of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE LP, TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Smith et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 1:2012cv01282
Plaintiff:
Peter Smith and Francoise Smith
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sierra Club, et al v. Bostick, et al
as 12-6201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, INC., CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE OKLAHOMA and EAST TEXAS SUB REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, MICHAEL TEAGUE, in his official capacity as Tulsa District Commander of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor:
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE LP, TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Sierra Club Inc et al v. Bostick et al
as 5:2012cv00742
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club Inc , Clean Energy Future Oklahoma and East Texas Sub Regional Planning Commission
Defendant:
Thomas P Bostick , Michael J Walsh , Michael Teague and others
Intervenor:
TransCanada Keystone Pipeline LP and TransCanada Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
