Cases 21 - 30 of 677
Pena v. Colbert, City of
as 6:2023cv00309
Petitioner:
Andrea Pena
Respondent:
Colbert, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pena v. Colbert, City of
as 6:2023cv00306
Petitioner:
Andrea Pena
Respondent:
Colbert, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pena v. Colbert, City of
as 6:2023cv00304
Petitioner:
Andrea Pena
Respondent:
Colbert, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pena v. Colbert, City of
as 6:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
Andrea Pena
Respondent:
Colbert, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pena v. Colbert, City of
as 6:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
Andrea Pena
Respondent:
Colbert, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Horton v. Tayloe et al
as 5:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Donald Emmitt Tayloe, Michael Charles Flanagan, Gerald Frank Neuwirth and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group, et al
as 23-3154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., CAROL MORRIS, LADUSKA ANNE HANEY and others
GWR Produce Inc v. Buddy's Produce of Oklahoma City Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00658
Defendant:
Tamre Deann Stover, Donald Stover, SR, Buddy's Produce of Oklahoma City Inc an Oklahoma Corporation doing business as Buddy's Produce Inc doing business as Buddys Produce Inc doing business as Buddys Produce and others
Plaintiff:
GWR Produce Inc
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
VB BTS II, LLC v. Dodge City, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02269
Plaintiff:
VB BTS II, LLC and Vertical Bridge
Defendant:
Dodge City, Kansas, City of and Dodge City, Kansas, City Commission of
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332 Mobile Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
