Cases 21 - 30 of 62
In re: Sullivan
as 19-6115
Respondent:
SCOTT CROW, Interim Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
DELMA LAMAR SULLIVAN
Sullivan v. Harris, et al
as 19-8009
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE R. HARRIS and ADAMSON GEITTMAN, P.C.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN W. SULLIVAN
Borrego v. Core Civic, et al
as 19-6004
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU PLYRD, official capacity, Head of the STG, SULLIVAN KIMBERLY, official capacity, Case Manager of Echo Unit, FNU GILLESPIE, official capacity, Unit Manager of Echo Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERTO BORREGO
Sullivan v. Harris et al
as 2:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
Susan W Sullivan
Defendant:
George R Harris and Adamson Geittman PC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dickson v. MediaNews Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00211
Plaintiff:
Lynn Dickson
Defendant:
MediaNews Group, Inc. , Denver Post Corporation, The and Sullivan Promotions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Sullivan v. Green Bay Packaging Inc
as 5:2017cv00862
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sullivan
Defendant:
Green Bay Packaging Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Sullivan
as 17-6099
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT WAYNE SULLIVAN
Sullivan v. Finn
as 1:2017mc00001
Plaintiff:
Joanna Sullivan
Defendant:
Stephen A. Finn
Interested_party:
Trust Company of America
Donelson, et al v. United States, et al
as 16-5174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTHA DONELSON, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all similarly situated persons and JOHN FRIEND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Through the Department of the Interior and its agency, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P., CHAPARRAL ENERGY, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
