Cases 31 - 40 of 234
United States v. Rodriguez
as 20-2173
Defendant / Appellant:
RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Rodriguez
as 20-3220
Defendant / Appellant:
RAUL MARCOS RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodriguez v. Barrera, et al
as 20-1376
Appellee:
MARIA DE LA LUZ MORO and JULIO CESAR BARRERA
Appellant:
SIMON E. RODRIGUEZ
Debtor:
In the Matter of: JULIO CESAR BARRERA
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Kam Blue Moon Bar, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00937
Defendant:
Kam Blue Moon Bar, LLC, Blue Moon Bar, LLC, Charlie Perez and others
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Lynn v. Wilkerson-Rodriguez, et al
as 20-3178
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY LEWIS-HARRIS, Chief Medical Director, Corizon Health, Inc., in his individual and official capacity, WENDY WASINGER, Med Tech, Corizon Health, Inc. @ Hutchinson Correctional Facility, in her individual and official capacity, JERRY KIPP, Captain, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK C. LYNN
Rodriguez v. Geico General Insurance
as 20-2111
Defendant / Appellee:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIEGO MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ
ITN Flix et al v. Hinojosa et al
as 2:2020mc00516
Defendant:
Robert Rodriguez, Machete Kills, Gloria Hinojosa and others
Plaintiff:
Gil Medina and ITN Flix
Diaz-Rodriguez v. Barr
as 20-9568
Petitioner:
JAVIER JESUS DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Rodriguez-Ortiz v. Barr
as 20-9545
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
CARLOS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-ORTIZ, AKA Carlos Rodriguez-Cisneros
Rodriguez v. Amtrak, et al
as 20-2053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
J. PERRY, AMTRAK and C. CHAVES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.