Cases 31 - 40 of 79
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 19-3021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL GRIES, MARVIN MILLER, BIEBER FARM and others
Appellant:
WATTS GUERRA LLP, HAGEN & HAGEN, P.C., DENNEY & BARRETT, PC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SYNGENTA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC., SYNGENTA SEEDS, LLC, FKA Syngenta Seeds, Inc., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG and others
Appellee:
HOLLAND LAW FIRM, GRAY, RITTER, GRAHAM, P.C., MCCULLEY MCCLUER PLLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Karpowitz v. Wakefield & Associates
as 2:2016cv00482
Plaintiff:
Kyle Karpowitz
Defendant:
Wakefield & Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wisdom v. Wakefield & Associates
as 2:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
Ryan Wisdom
Defendant:
Wakefield & Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Blixseth v. Credit Suisse AG, et al
as 15-1375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY L. BLIXSETH, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF COLORADO, INC., a Colorado corporation, DEAN PAUWW, an individual and citizen of the State of Colorado, CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC., a New York corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
