Cases 41 - 50 of 90
United States v. Barne
as 15-7020
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND A. BARNES
United States v. Barne
as 15-6025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEREMY JEVON BARNES
Carr et al v. Martinez et al
as 1:2015mc00045
Petitioner:
Kerman-Ray Carr and Priscilla-Denise Carr
Respondent:
Alex J. Martinez, Stephanie O'Malley, Robert White and others
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00299
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Kristine L. Johnson , Troy A. Barnes, Work With Troy Barnes Inc and others
Interested_party:
Arla Mendenhall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Carr et al v. Martinez et al
as 1:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Kerman-Ray Carr and Priscilla-Denise Carr
Defendant:
Alex J. Martinez, Stephanie O'Malley, Robert White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 5514
Garrett v. Hansen et al
as 6:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M. Garrett
Defendant:
Carol M. Hansen, Carlotta Gordon, Robert Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Barnes v. Monsanto Company, CA
as 2:2013md02473
Plaintiff:
Ernest Barnes , Dreger Enterprises , Wahl Ranch Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, CA and Keller Grain Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
In re: Banks, et al
as 13-1416
Petitioner:
DAVID A. BANKS, DEMETRIUS K. HARPER, AKA Ken Harper, GARY L. WALKER and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF COLORADO, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, DARLENE MARTINEZ, Court Reporter and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
