Cases 51 - 60 of 150
United States v. Murphy
as 16-3255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBBY ALAN MURPHY
United States v. Murphy
as 16-5118
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRYAN JAMES MURPHY
Davis v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2016cv00701
Plaintiff:
Gilbert D. Davis
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Robert (I) A. Mc Donald, Robert A. Mc Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Holden v. KOAA TV Channel 5 & 30 et al
as 1:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Levi Holden
Defendant:
KOAA TV Channel 5 & 30, Cordillera Communications, Inc., Evening Post Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2252
Type:
Other Statutes
Helo Energy et al v. Hoggan et al
as 1:2016mc00016
Plaintiff:
Helo Energy , Sand Canyon of Tehachapi and Saugatuck Energy
Defendant:
Jefrey Hoggan , Kent A. Hoggan , Heather K. Kann and others
Cross_defendant:
RAR Energy Consulting, Fishcreek Capital Funding, Rudy Saenz and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
United States v. Murphy
as 15-5123
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRYAN JAMES MURPHY, AKA Bryan Michael Sebesta
Oppenheimerfunds, et al v. Stockwell, et al
as 15-706
Petitioner:
OPPENHEIMERFUNDS, INC, JOHN V. MURPHY, OPPENHEIMERFUNDS DISTRIBUTOR, INC. and others
Respondent:
ROBERT RIVERA, STEPHEN LOWE, FRANK TACKMANN and others
:
, , and others
In Re: Motor Fuel Temperature
as 15-3254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANNIE SMITH, CHRISTOPHER PAYNE, PHYLLIS LERNER and others
Plaintiff:
IN RE: MOTOR FUEL TEMPERATURE SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Defendant - Appellant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.
Defendant:
BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC., BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC, CASEY'S GENERAL STORES, INC. and others
Objector:
SPEEDWAY LLC, 7-ELEVEN, INC., CIRCLE K STORES, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
