Cases 71 - 80 of 171
In re: Morgan
as 20-6123
Petitioner:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
In re: Draper
as 20-6122
Petitioner:
In re: ERNEST DRAPER
Respondent:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
McGee v. Corizon, et al
as 20-3111
Defendant / Appellee:
D. LUNDRY, Medical Administrator, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO ALEXANDER MCGEE
Parker v. Crow
as 20-5057
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALVIN PARKER
Parkhurst v. Pacheco, et al
as 20-8027
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK R. PARKHURST
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL PACHECO, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, in his official capacity and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Eby v. Peterson, et al
as 20-2064
Defendant / Appellee:
K. JAN PETERSON and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CHARLES EBY
Webb v. WYDOC Med. Corr. Inst. Warden, et al
as 20-8023
Respondent / Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDIUM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDEN and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLINT RAYMOND WEBB
Clark v. Oklahoma DOC, et al
as 20-6085
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU GRAY, in official capacity as case manager, JEORLD BRAGGS, JR., Warden, BILLIE LNU, Sick Call Nurse and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID GEORGE CLARK
Counts v. Wilson, et al
as 20-8028
Defendant / Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIA VANMATRE, WARDEN MICHAEL PACHECO, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIA DANIEL RAMILLER and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER COUNTS
Lay v. Oklahoma DOC, et al
as 20-6038
Defendant / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA STATE PENITENTIARY, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JERRY PERRY, H-Unit, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
