Cases 81 - 90 of 1,052
Wallace v. Egan et al
as 2:2020cv00836
Defendant:
Brent Satterfield, Co-Diagnostics, Richard S. Serbin and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bedford, et al v. Nowlin, et al
as 20-7070
Defendant / Appellant:
MARY NOWLIN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SONDRA N. PACE, WILLIAM SCOTT BEDFORD and RAY H. PACE
Defendant:
THE HELEN AND MARY NOWLIN IRREVOCABLE COMMON LAW TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 28, 1927
Keybank National Association v. Williams, et al
as 20-1384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WELDON and CHARLES H. WILLIAMS
United States v. Nguyen
as 20-3217
Defendant / Appellant:
PHOUC H. NGUYEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Schoppe v. State of Utah, et al
as 20-4111
Defendant / Appellee:
WORKFORCE SERVICES, STATE OF UTAH, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN H. SCHOPPE
Young v. Balderas
as 20-2141
Defendant / Appellee:
HECTOR H. BALDERAS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUGUETTE NICOLE YOUNG
Stark v. State of Ohio, et al
as 20-2140
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CINCINNATI, SUN BEHAVIOR HEALTH, Erlanger Kentucky, STATE OF OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PIPER STARK
Swomley, et al v. Schroyer, et al
as 20-1335
Petitioner / Appellant:
TOM STEWART, ERIC VOTH, SARAH SWOMLEY and others
Respondent / Appellee:
KAREN SCHROYER, in her official capacity as District Ranger, Aspen-Sopris Ranger District, White River National Forest, United States Forest Service and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02947
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00992
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
