Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Broach v. Yegappan, et al
as 21-1390
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM G. BROACH
Defendant / Appellee:
MUTHULAKSHMI YEGAPPAN, ROBERT MAGNUSSON, ANGELA MORRIS and others
Melnick v. Raemisch, et al
as 21-1330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUNTER ADAM MELNICK
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, KAYLA JOHNSTON, CPO, DEAN GONZALES and others
Copeland, et al v. C.A.A.I.R., et al
as 21-5024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IKAIKA KAMAI, NATHAN TAYLOR, TRAVIS OWENS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET WILKERSON, JIM LOVELL, C.A.A.I.R., a domestic not for profit corporation and others
Schwab, et al v. Kansas DCF, et al
as 20-3099
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY WILKERSON, CARLA SCHWARTZ, GINA MEIER-HUMMEL and others
Defendant:
DEJA JACKSON, BLAKE ROBINSON, RHONDA EISENBAREGER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMELIA SCHWAB and RAYMOND SCHWAB
Washington v. Oklahoma State DHS, et al
as 19-5077
Defendant:
MARGARET EAGLER, CHARENE NOWICKI, TRINA STROUT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNA WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Argus Contracting, LP v. Gilmore et al
as 1:2016cv01865
Plaintiff:
Argus Contracting, LP
Defendant:
Charles "RIP" Gilmore and Frontier Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1831
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02751
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. Gilmore
as 15-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEREMY GILMORE
United States v. Gilmore
as 14-1088
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE GILMORE
Gilmore, et al v. Weatherford, et al
as 11-5025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. GILMORE, TAMMY S. GILMORE SPRINGER and JOANNA K. STAND, individual owners in Indian trust property
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHY J. WEATHERFORD, personal representative of the estate of Joseph E. Mountford, deceased and BINGHAM SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, INC., a foreign corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
