Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bowman v. Sawyer, et al
as 20-1225
Defendant / Appellee:
J.E. KRUEGER, Regional Director, North Central Regional Office F.B.O.P., BRAD GRELICK, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Englewood, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Interim Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH F. BOWMAN
McGowan v. Huddleston, et al
as 19-1383
Defendant / Appellee:
D. BEHLE, Lieutenant, J. COULSON, Case Manager, C. PORCO, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MCGOWAN
United States v. Krueger
as 19-2052
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID LAWRENCE KRUEGER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Krueger v. ONEOK Partners, L.P. et al
as 4:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Juergen Krueger
Defendant:
ONEOK Partners, L.P., Terry K Spencer, John W Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Beicker, et al v. Hickenlooper
as 14-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID STRUMILLO, JIM BEICKER, Sheriff of Fremont County, RICK BESECKER, Sheriff of Gunnison County and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Govenor of the State of Colorado
Beicker, et al v. Hickenlooper
as 14-1292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MINOR, Sheriff of Summit County, GABRIEL DAVID JOINER, Sheriff of Cheyenne County, TONY SPURLOCK, Sheriff of Douglas County and others
Amicus Curiae:
LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, STATE OF MARYLAND, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner:
LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Govenor of the State of Colorado
United States v. Krueger
as 14-3035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
ZACHARY E. KRUEGER
Colorado Outfitters Association et al v. Hickenlooper
as 1:2013cv01300
Plaintiff:
John B. Cooke , Terry Maketa , Justin Smith and others
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
