Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner:
STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
United States v. Kurtz
as 15-2140
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM KURTZ
Beicker, et al v. Hickenlooper
as 14-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID STRUMILLO, JIM BEICKER, Sheriff of Fremont County, RICK BESECKER, Sheriff of Gunnison County and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Govenor of the State of Colorado
Beicker, et al v. Hickenlooper
as 14-1292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MINOR, Sheriff of Summit County, GABRIEL DAVID JOINER, Sheriff of Cheyenne County, TONY SPURLOCK, Sheriff of Douglas County and others
Amicus Curiae:
LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, STATE OF MARYLAND, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner:
LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Govenor of the State of Colorado
Colorado Outfitters Association et al v. Hickenlooper
as 1:2013cv01300
Plaintiff:
John B. Cooke , Terry Maketa , Justin Smith and others
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
AG Equipment Company et al v. Heidenreiter
as 4:2008cv00214
Plaintiff:
AG Equipment Company, AG Equipment Company, Suzanne Ash-Kurtz and others
Defendant:
Mark Heidenreiter and Mark Heidenreiter
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United Van Lines, LLC v. Med 1 Online et al
as 1:2007cv02402
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Med 1 Online, Mark Preston, TCL Asset Group and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 13101 ICC Termination Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
