Other Statutes Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 552
Michenzie v. Heartland Financial USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01741
Plaintiff: Mary Michenzie
Defendant: Heartland Financial USA, Inc., John K. Schmidt, Bruce K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Marquez et al v. Federal Emergency Management
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff: Spring Victoria Marquez, Diane Lee Martinez, Rico Martinez and others
Defendant: Federal Emergency Management and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Plaintiff: Douglas Mastriano
Defendant: James Gregory, III, Roland Kuhn, Paul Mazerolle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USSEC v. Reven Holdings, Inc., et al
as 24-1235
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: REVEN HOLDINGS, INC., DBA Reven Pharmaceuticals, REVEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BRIAN D. DENOMME and others
Intervenor: LEAH SCHAAT and LEE ANN FROST
Outer Range, Inc. et al v. Chang
as 1:2024cv00671
Plaintiff: Outer Range, Inc., Emily Cleghorn, Steven Lee Cleghorn and others
Defendant: Ryan Chang
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
United States v. Giles
as 24-5039
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CALEB LEE GILES
United States v. Lee
as 24-1115
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SHE LER YER LEE
Marshall v. Kovo HealthTech Corporation
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lee Marshall and Jonathan Marshall
Defendant: Kovo HealthTech Corporation
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration
United States v. Summers
as 24-5030
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHNNY LEE SUMMERS
Chang v. Outer Range, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Petitioner: Ryan Chang
Respondent: Outer Range, Inc., Steven Lee Cleghorn and Emily Cleghorn
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?