Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Comcast of California/Massachusetts/Michigan/Utah v. FirstDigital Communications et al
as 2:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Comcast of California/Massachusetts/Michigan/Utah
Defendant:
FirstDigital Communications, FirstDigital Telecom, Vineyard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff:
DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Cornelison v. Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corp, et al
as 22-4113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY CORNELISON
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE CORPORATION, DBA American Student Assistance, a Massachusetts Nonprofit Corporation, MIGUEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Education and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, a Department of the United States
Holcomb v. RELX Inc et al
as 1:2021cv02771
Plaintiff:
John Holcomb
Defendant:
RELX Inc a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Massachusetts, doing business within the State of Colorado under the trade name of doing business as LexisNexis and Timothy S Hintz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Hayward v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
as 1:2021cv02370
Plaintiff:
John Hayward
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
S. et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts et al
as 2:2021mc00502
Plaintiff:
Brent S., Angie S., J. B. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts HMO Blue
M., et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield
as 21-4053
Defendant / Appellant:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS, DBA Blue Cross Blue Shield HMO Blue
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT M., individually and as guardian of C.M., a minor and LAURI M., individually and as guardian of C.M., a minor
ClearOne v. Chiang, et al
as 20-4108
Defendant:
LONNY BOWERS, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, JUN YANG, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLEARONE, INC., FKA ClearOne Communications, Inc., a Utah corporation
Interested Party:
DONALD BOWERS
Intervenor:
DAVID SULLIVAN
ClearOne v. Chiang, et al
as 20-4105
Defendant:
LONNY BOWERS, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, JUN YANG, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLEARONE, INC., FKA ClearOne Communications, Inc., a Utah corporation
Interested Party:
DONALD BOWERS
Intervenor:
DAVID SULLIVAN
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6045
Defendant / Appellant:
J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae:
THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, FIFTY-FOUR MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA SENATE AND OKLAHOMA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
