Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Oklahoma State of et al v. Biden et al
as 5:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of, J Kevin Stitt, John M O'Connor and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Oklahoma State of et al v. Biden et al
as 5:2021cv01069
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of, Kevin J Stitt and John M OConnor
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Schell v. Gurich, et al
as 20-6044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK E. FIELDS, member, Oklahoma Bar Association Board of Governors, JUSTICE JAMES E. EDMONDSON, Associate Justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, JOHN MORRIS WILLIAMS, Executive Director, Oklahoma Bar Association and Secretary/Treasurer, Oklahoma Bar Association Board of Governors and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK E. SCHELL
United States v. Rochel-Cervantes
as 19-3263
Defendant / Appellant:
SIMON ROCHEL-CERVANTES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Driessen v. Home Loan State Bank
as 13-1215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCHELLE DRIESSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
HOME LOAN STATE BANK
Driessen v. Home Loan State Bank
as 1:2012cv02220
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Driessen
Defendant:
Home Loan State Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
