Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN AREVALO, an individual, LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, DAVID D. CARRERA, an individual and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH DELAROSA, an individual, ADELA MORRISON, an individual, STEVEN D. OLSON, an individual and others
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN L. BOWKER, in his official and individual capacity and JOSEPH MCDADE, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant:
LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, KEVIN CLOCK, an individual, PAUL CONABLE, an individual and others
Cross Claimant:
STEVEN J. MCDADE, an individual
Biers v. Dentons US et al
as 2:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Biers
Defendant:
Dentons US a Utah Entity doing business as Dentons, Durham, Jones, Pinegar, Zions Bancorporation, Salal Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mohamed v. Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SC
as 1:2014rj00021
Plaintiff:
Timur Mohamed
Defendant:
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00275
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Defendant:
United States of America , United States Department of Interior , United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rural Telephone Service Co, et al v. FCC, et al
as 12-9533
Petitioner:
RURAL TELEPHONE SERVICE COMPANY, INC., ADAK EAGLE ENTERPRISES LLC, ADAMS TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
