Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Nichols v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Timothy Nichols
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Miller v. M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Bruce Miller
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Gurewitz v. M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gurewitz
Defendant:
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., Larry A. Mizel, David D. Mandarich and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bedore v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 1:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Travis T. Bedore
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605
Graham et al v. USA
as 1:2021cv03053
Plaintiff:
Ricky T Graham, Connie L. Archuleta and Ricky T. Graham
Defendant:
USA
Level 3 Communications LLC v. AT&T Corporation
as 1:2021cv02394
Plaintiff:
Level 3 Communications LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0203 - Telecommunications Collection of Charges
Taylor v. Raven Industries, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv02321
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
Raven Industries, Inc, Jason M Andringa, Thomas S Everist and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Reinhardt v. Raven Industries, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv02323
Plaintiff:
Charles Reinhardt
Defendant:
Raven Industries, Inc, Jason M Andringa, Thomas S Everist and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Boyko v. Realty Income Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01653
Defendant:
Realty Income Corporation, Priya Cherian Huskins, Gregory T. McLaughlin and others
Plaintiff:
Calyn Boyko
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
