Cases 1 - 10 of 21
In re: Mitchell
as 23-7052
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL LEE MITCHELL
Respondent:
JASON CHENNAULT, Sheriff, Cherokee County and SARA HILL, Cherokee Nation Attorney General
LS3 Inc. v. Cherokee Nation Strategic Programs, et al
as 21-1385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LS3 INC., a Maryland corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
CHEROKEE NATION STRATEGIC PROGRAMS, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, CHEROKEE FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, CHEROKEE SERVICES GROUP, LLC, a Cherokee Nation limited liability company and others
Cherokee Nation, The et al v. Bunch et al
as 4:2020cv00596
Defendant:
Joe Bunch, Eddie Sacks, Jeannie Tidwell and others
Plaintiff:
Cherokee Nation, The and Cherokee Nation Businesses, LLC
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
United Keetoowah Band, et al v. Barteaux
as 20-5102
Defendant / Appellee:
T. LUKE BARTEAUX, Presiding District Judge for the District Court of the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, a federally recognized Indian tribe
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA, a federally recognized Indian tribe as parens patriae for K.P. and KELLY PRITCHETT EVAN, an individual and next friend of K.P.
Cherokee Nation, et al v. Bernhardt, et al
as 20-5054
Intervenor Defendant:
UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA and UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
TARA KATUK MACLEAN SWEENEY, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior, and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHEROKEE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC and THE CHEROKEE NATION
Cherokee Nation, et al v. Bernhardt, et al
as 20-5055
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior and TARA KATUK MACLEAN SWEENEY, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA and UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHEROKEE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC and THE CHEROKEE NATION
The Cherokee Nation et al v. Stitt
as 5:2019cv01198
Counter Defendant:
Chickasaw Nation, The
Plaintiff:
Cherokee Nation, The and Choctaw Nation, The
Defendant:
J Kevin Stitt
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Quapaw Nation, Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma, The Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America et al v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
as 4:2019cv00697
Defendant:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Plaintiff:
Osage Nation, Delaware Tribe of Indians, Cherokee Nation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Cherokee Nation, et al v. Jewell, et al
as 13-5109
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE CHEROKEE NATION and CHEROKEE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. BLACK, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior, KENNETH L. SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior and SALLY JEWELL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior
Defendant-Intervenor:
UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA
Cherokee Nation, et al v. Jewell, et al
as 13-5106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE CHEROKEE NATION and CHEROKEE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Defendant:
KENNETH L. SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior and MICHAEL S. BLACK, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellant:
UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
