Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Ross v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp et al
as 5:2013cv00332
Plaintiff:
Marion Ross
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ross v. Rothstein
as 2:2013cv02101
Plaintiff:
Stanton E. Ross
Defendant:
Adam Rothstein
Counter_claimant:
Adam Rothstein
Counter_defendant:
Stanton E. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ross v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Ross
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., Biomet Manufacturing Corporation, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ross v. CBOCS West, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02951
Plaintiff:
Lance H. Ross
Defendant:
CBOCS West, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Buck v. American Quarter Horse Association et al
as 2:2012cv00693
Plaintiff:
Edward Allan Buck
Defendant:
American Quarter Horse Association, Peter J. Cofrancesco, III, Gene Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ross v. BNSF
as 12-6013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOROTHY ROSS, individually and as surviving spouse of Elmer Ross, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Docksey et al v. Janda
as 1:2011cv02595
Plaintiff:
Christine Docksey and Ross Docksey
Defendant:
Taylor Janda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross et al v. John and Jane Does 1-5
as 1:2011cv01877
Plaintiff:
S. Jawn Ross and S. Jawn Ross, PC
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Kislyak v. McCleve et al
as 2:2011cv00359
Plaintiff:
Pavel Mark Kislyak
Defendant:
Sheila McCleve, Cynthia Vitko, FNU Sawiky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company
as 5:2010cv01354
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ross
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
