Cases 1 - 10 of 158
White v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Barry White
Defendant:
William Adams, Carol Adams, Adams Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Adams v. Peirce
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
LaToya L Adams
Defendant:
Hester M Peirce
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Wyles v. Sussman, et al
as 24-1226
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE M. WYLES
Defendant:
ALLEN ZACHARY SUSSMAN, LOEB & LOEB LLP, ALUMINAID INTERNATIONAL, A.G. and others
Affify v. James et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Adam Affify
Defendant:
Jonathan James and Shanita James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Laird v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Tyler Laird
Defendant:
Carol Adams, Craig Thomsen and Hodges Farms and Dredging, LLC a foreign limited liability company d/b/a Jeff Hodges Farms - Jeff Hodges Farms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Morin v. Cheyenne Creek Apartments, LLC
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Adam Morin
Defendant:
Cheyenne Creek Apartments LLC a Colorado limited liability company doing business as Weidner Apartment Homes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams v. Brown
as 6:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Aubrey M. Adams
Defendant:
Ralph E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Adams v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Ashley D. Adams
Defendant:
E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pacheco v. City of Espanola
as 1:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Adam Pacheco
Defendant:
City of Espanola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
