Cases 1 - 6 of 6
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Newmar Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00436
Defendant:
Newmar Corporation, Daimler Trucks North America LLC and John Doe
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. NOIT45282018 v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations et al
as 2:2020cv00272
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. NOIT45282018 and A
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, Daimler Trucks North America and California Truck Centers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. CBBCN25810 v. Reed et al
as 2:2013cv02204
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. CBBCN25810
Defendant:
Roderick Reed, Navistar International Corporation and Daimler Truck North America LLC
Cross_claimant:
Navistar International Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Daimler Truck North America LLC and Roderick Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Kechi Township, et al v. Freightliner
as 12-3134
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KECHI TOWNSHIP and EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
FREIGHTLINER, LLC, NKA Daimler Trucks North America, LLC
Township, et al v. Freightliner
as 12-3118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KECHI TOWNSHIP and EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
FREIGHTLINER, LLC, NKA Daimler Trucks North America, LLC
Winfield, Kansas, City of v. Key Equipment & Supply Co. et al
as 6:2011cv01358
Plaintiff:
Winfield, Kansas, City of
Defendant:
Key Equipment & Supply Co. , Elgin Sweeper Company and Daimler Trucks North America, L.L.C.
Cross_claimant:
Elgin Sweeper Company and Key Equipment & Supply Co.
Cross_defendant:
Daimler Trucks North America, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
