Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Q.B. Associates Ltd. et al v. City of Leadville et al
as 1:2012cv01049
Plaintiff:
Q.B. Associates Ltd. and Eddie Halcomb
Defendant:
City of Leadville , Leadville/Lake County Fire Rescue , Lake County Building and Land Use Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Hentges v. Jefferson County, Colorado et al
as 1:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
John (I) M. Hentges
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Colorado, Debbie (I) Moss, Debbie Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Moss et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Mark Ethan Duffy
Defendant:
Debbie Moss , Stephanie Simpson , Katie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonidy et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2010cv02408
Plaintiff:
Debbie Bonidy , Tab Bonidy and National Association for Gun Rights
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, John Potter and Steve Ruehle
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Schupper v. Cafasso et al
as 1:2010cv01853
Plaintiff:
Sanford B. Schupper
Defendant:
Robyn (I) Cafasso, Robyn Cafasso, William (I) Edie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.