Cases 21 - 30 of 1,041
Smith v. City of North Branch
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of North Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith (PS) et al v. Marks et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Sanford Smith, Jr. and Angela Smith
Defendant:
Jonathan A Marks, Candlewyck Condominium Association, Hammersmith Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lietzke v. Birmingham City of et al
as 5:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Birmingham City of and Patrick D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Patrick D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis (PS) v. Saint Anthony's Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Latonya Denise Davis, Curtis Meeks, Jr., Anita Jean Dilworth and others
Defendant:
Saint Anthony's Hospital, Heidit B. Lisa Patel, Lisa Heidit B. Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Oklahoma State of v. Smith
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of
Defendant:
Zackry Deon Smith Corp. Sole doing business as Zackry Deon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Taylor v. Maynard et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Andrew Taylor
Defendant:
FNU Maynard, FNU Wilson, Blair Wardle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Franklin Brisbin Jr. v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Estate of Franklin Brisbin Jr.
Defendant:
Danny Smith and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Restaurant Depot
as 2:2023cv02573
Plaintiff:
Melvin Smith, Jr. and Malik Rahman
Defendant:
Restaurant Depot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
