Cases 41 - 50 of 192
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jared P. et al v. Poudre School District R-1 et al
as 1:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Jared P. and Sarah P.
Defendant:
Poudre School District R-1, Terrence Jones, Andrew Tope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Accommodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Anderson v. Bimestefer et al
as 1:2021cv03175
Plaintiff:
Sarah Anderson
Defendant:
Executive Director Kim Bimestefer, Tracy Johnson, Peter Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flagg v. Department of Children and Family Services et al
as 6:2021cv01281
Plaintiff:
Royal Flagg, Sarah Flagg, Amanda Haugen and others
Defendant:
Department of Children and Family Services, Great Bend Police Department, Saint Francis Ministries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafoya v. Martha
as 1:2021cv03058
Plaintiff:
Sarah Tafoya
Defendant:
Mario Martha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Naranjo et al v. Victor et al
as 1:2021cv02729
Plaintiff:
Sarah Naranjo, Adorno Marie and Marie Adorno
Defendant:
Brandon Victor and City of Pueblo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2021cv02432
Plaintiff:
Sarah Smith
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montoya v. Rio Rancho Public Schools Board of Education et al
as 1:2021cv00648
Plaintiff:
Sarah Montoya
Defendant:
Rio Rancho Public Schools Board of Education and George Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
