Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02578
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada
Global E, LLC v. Lundahl
as 16-8029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTI LUNDAHL and HOLLIE TELFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTURYLINK PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and GLOBAL E LLC, DBA Pioneer Park MHC
Lundahl, et al v. Global E. LLC, et al
as 15-8120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTI LUNDAHL and HOLLIE TELFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
GLOBAL E. LLC D/B/A PIONEER PARK MHC, LINCOLN COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE, in her official capacity a/k/a Nena James, CENTURYLINK PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS INC and others
Lundahl et al v. Global E LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Marti Lundahl and Hollie Telford
Defendant:
Global E LLC, Lincoln County District Judge, Centurylink Public Communications Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lundahl et al v. Global E LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Marti Lundahl and Hollie Telford
Defendant:
Global E LLC, Lincoln County District Judge, Centurylink Public Communications Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
