Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tuck v. Nowlin et al
as 1:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tuck
Defendant:
Steven D. Nowlin, Jeffrey Copeland, John Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pro-Police Rally Colorado et al v. Hancock et al
as 1:2022cv01789
Plaintiff:
Pro-Police Rally Colorado, Ron Maclachlan Sr, Casper Stockham and others
Defendant:
Mayor MICHAEL B. HANCOCK, Acting Manager Murphy Robinson, Chief of Police Paul Pazen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc - Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Amin et al v. Loup Management Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01441
Plaintiff:
Hodan A. Amin , Abdi Mohamed Noor , Mohamed Sufi and others
Defendant:
Loup Management Company, Inc. , Parker Point LLC and Shelly Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Haynes v. City and County of Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2015cv00826
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Haynes
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, Library Commission of Denver Public Library, Steven Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Scott et al
as 1:2010cv02680
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Haynes
Defendant:
Thomas Scott and Pamela Tobin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Hedman et al
as 1:2010cv01286
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Haynes
Defendant:
Holly M. Hedman, Dwayne G. Roybal and Daniel C. Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
