Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Noble v. City of Eunice, et al
as 2:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Durwood Owen Noble
Defendant:
City of Eunice and Carlton Glen Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
James v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00794
Defendant:
Kewa Pueblo, United States of America, Juwan Lakota and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren Tenzin James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trubow et al v. Kramer et al
as 1:2020cv01248
Defendant:
Kenneth C Owens, Lindsay Rollins, David C. Kramer and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Trubow and Patrick McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Owens
as 1:2017cv00915
Plaintiff:
Terry Owens
Defendant:
Celeste Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Owens v. Stoll
as 1:2012cv01302
Plaintiff:
Lee K Owens
Defendant:
Charles Stoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guy v. American International Group Inc. (AIG) et al
as 1:2011cv00063
Plaintiff:
Richard Guy
Defendant:
American International Group Inc. (AIG), International American Products Inc. (IAP), Kellogg Brown and Root Inc. (KBR) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. American International Group Inc. (AIG) et al
as 2:2011cv00063
Plaintiff:
Richard Guy
Defendant:
American International Group Inc. (AIG), International American Products Inc. (IAP), Kellogg Brown and Root Inc. (KBR) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
