Cases 91 - 100 of 267
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Meyer
as 5:2022cv03023
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
Neosho County District Court and Shannon Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brunner v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2022cv00020
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections, Dan Shannon and others
Petitioner:
Donald Earl Brunner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Tuxhorn et al
as 5:2022cv03018
Plaintiff:
Tommy Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
E. Tuxhorn, D. Robison, Leu Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gentzler et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Patrick Gentzler, Raeanne Will, Zylstra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez (ID 95438) v. Meyer
as 5:2022cv03001
Petitioner:
Omar Israel Hernandez
Respondent:
Shannon Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vreeland v. Shannon et al
as 0:2021cv00213
Defendant:
Dan Shannon, Scott Abbott, Niecole Molden and others
Plaintiff:
Delmart EJM Vreeland, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice (ID 74505) v. Robinson et al
as 5:2021cv03260
Plaintiff:
Jason Alan Justice
Defendant:
Julie A. Robinson, Kevin O'Connor, Laura Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Waliallah (ID 63711) v. Meyer
as 5:2021cv03242
Petitioner:
Muhammad Ismael Waliallah
Respondent:
Shannon Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bayha (ID 114199) v. Meyer
as 5:2021cv03232
Petitioner:
Madio T. Bayha and Madio Torrence Bayha
Respondent:
Shannon Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Askew (ID 125411) v. Meyer
as 5:2021cv03202
Petitioner:
William Askew
Respondent:
Crawford County District Court and Shannon Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.