Cases 101 - 110 of 248
Aurit v. Medina et al
as 1:2013cv02426
Plaintiff:
Todd A Aurit
Defendant:
Angel Medina, Loe Archuleta, Ron Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit v. Suthers et al
as 1:2013cv02427
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
John W. Suthers, Angel Medina, Gerald Marronney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Medina et al
as 1:2013cv02213
Plaintiff:
Keith Clayton Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Angel Medina, Angel (I) Medina, David Gabriel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Medina, et al
as 13-1324
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LEE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden Fremont Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Medina v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv01936
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 cc Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000
Medina v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2013cv01898
Petitioner:
Ernest J. Medina
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich
Plaintiff:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2013cv01879
Petitioner:
Ernest J. Medina
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucero v. Medina, et al
as 13-1300
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY LUCERO
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Ontiveros-Perez v. Medina, et al
as 13-1298
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIO ONTIVEROS-PEREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Medina v. Weber, et al
as 13-1273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN AMBROSE MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAWN M. WEBER, Deputy District Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
