Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Ramirez-Hernandez v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv01043
Movant:
Jose Jesus Ramirez-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ramirez-Hernandez v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00675
Movant:
Jose Jesus Ramirez-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00604
Movant:
Alex Joe Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Espinoza-Hernandez v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00436
Petitioner:
Dante Espinoza-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ryan v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Keith Ivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00999
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Hernandez-Espolina v. USA
as 4:2015cv00470
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dagoberto Hernandez-Espolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2015cv00436
Petitioner:
Gregory Michael Hernandez
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of, Jason Bryan and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Klein v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 6:2014cv00144
Plaintiff:
Q. Aaron Klein
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Marty Garrison, Tim Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Loera-Hernandez v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv00052
Movant:
Fernando De Loera-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
